<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorry Shaq, But You Are No Kareem OR Biggie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestartingfive.net/2008/06/24/sorry-shaq-but-you-are-no-kareem-or-biggie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/06/24/sorry-shaq-but-you-are-no-kareem-or-biggie/</link>
	<description>Bangin’ and Scorin’ Every Trip Down the Floor</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Florida vs. Oklahoma: So What? &#124; The Starting Five</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/06/24/sorry-shaq-but-you-are-no-kareem-or-biggie/#comment-21502</link>
		<dc:creator>Florida vs. Oklahoma: So What? &#124; The Starting Five</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1219#comment-21502</guid>
		<description>[...] Gaston is leading Michigan to the title&#8211;I can&#8217;t talk about it at length. Where does the conversation lead anyway?  Sphere: Related Content   FShareWidget.displayFShareButtonCode({ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gaston is leading Michigan to the title&#8211;I can&#8217;t talk about it at length. Where does the conversation lead anyway?  Sphere: Related Content   FShareWidget.displayFShareButtonCode({ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdubb</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/06/24/sorry-shaq-but-you-are-no-kareem-or-biggie/#comment-13082</link>
		<dc:creator>jdubb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1219#comment-13082</guid>
		<description>@ronglover...
thats not how I deciphered the lyric, I did not think he was saying he was better than kareem, even if he did say it like that and ..it's a freestyle who cares you hear wack ass rappers all the time boasting about thier "exploits" why should it be in different for Shaq,
Shaq has always been cool with me. Meet him a few times when he was in Orlando and a few times we came over to Germany..he is the same cat he was when he was 20 and the same cat now...People seem to be overly sensitive when it comes to Kobe
damn it was a freestyle , you can tell he was just going for laughs anyways
lighten up yall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ronglover&#8230;<br />
thats not how I deciphered the lyric, I did not think he was saying he was better than kareem, even if he did say it like that and ..it&#8217;s a freestyle who cares you hear wack ass rappers all the time boasting about thier &#8220;exploits&#8221; why should it be in different for Shaq,<br />
Shaq has always been cool with me. Meet him a few times when he was in Orlando and a few times we came over to Germany..he is the same cat he was when he was 20 and the same cat now&#8230;People seem to be overly sensitive when it comes to Kobe<br />
damn it was a freestyle , you can tell he was just going for laughs anyways<br />
lighten up yall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronglover</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/06/24/sorry-shaq-but-you-are-no-kareem-or-biggie/#comment-13063</link>
		<dc:creator>ronglover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1219#comment-13063</guid>
		<description>The deal is he's a grown as man doin the same shit he was doin when he was 20. It was funny back then. Then the shit he says in the rhyme. He couldn't f*ck with Kareem and he knows it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deal is he&#8217;s a grown as man doin the same shit he was doin when he was 20. It was funny back then. Then the shit he says in the rhyme. He couldn&#8217;t f*ck with Kareem and he knows it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdubb</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/06/24/sorry-shaq-but-you-are-no-kareem-or-biggie/#comment-13058</link>
		<dc:creator>jdubb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1219#comment-13058</guid>
		<description>@Mizzo ..it relevant just based on the freestyle by Shaq, it has to be slow news cycle because this is getting no play in my neck of the woods and people over here love Kobe to death.
It was Shaq having fun..yall are pretty heavy handed when it comes to Shaq..nothing Shaq said in his "freestyle" was untrue so whats the deal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mizzo ..it relevant just based on the freestyle by Shaq, it has to be slow news cycle because this is getting no play in my neck of the woods and people over here love Kobe to death.<br />
It was Shaq having fun..yall are pretty heavy handed when it comes to Shaq..nothing Shaq said in his &#8220;freestyle&#8221; was untrue so whats the deal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mizzo</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/06/24/sorry-shaq-but-you-are-no-kareem-or-biggie/#comment-13056</link>
		<dc:creator>Mizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1219#comment-13056</guid>
		<description>And how is that relevant to the post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how is that relevant to the post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hasani</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/06/24/sorry-shaq-but-you-are-no-kareem-or-biggie/#comment-13054</link>
		<dc:creator>Hasani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1219#comment-13054</guid>
		<description>Here's some basic logic for you guys, who appear not to understand a very basic point:

1.  Wade without Shaq  --&#62;  no rings
2.  Kobe without Shaq  --&#62; no rings
3.  Shaq without Wade --&#62;  3 rings
4.  Shaq without Kobe --&#62; 1 ring

It thus follows that Shaq is more integral to championship quality basketball than is either Wade or Kobe, based on the only (circumstantial) evidence at our disposal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s some basic logic for you guys, who appear not to understand a very basic point:</p>
<p>1.  Wade without Shaq  &#8211;&gt;  no rings<br />
2.  Kobe without Shaq  &#8211;&gt; no rings<br />
3.  Shaq without Wade &#8211;&gt;  3 rings<br />
4.  Shaq without Kobe &#8211;&gt; 1 ring</p>
<p>It thus follows that Shaq is more integral to championship quality basketball than is either Wade or Kobe, based on the only (circumstantial) evidence at our disposal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vleeflo</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/06/24/sorry-shaq-but-you-are-no-kareem-or-biggie/#comment-13050</link>
		<dc:creator>vleeflo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1219#comment-13050</guid>
		<description>I hate that  called himself an emcee. Kane, KRS, Chuck-D, Pun, Rakim, Common, the list could go on and on and be debated forever and ever. Shaq would definitely not make the emcee list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate that  called himself an emcee. Kane, KRS, Chuck-D, Pun, Rakim, Common, the list could go on and on and be debated forever and ever. Shaq would definitely not make the emcee list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
