So Democrats Are Voting For Republicans Now? The John McCain Exploitation of Hillary Clinton Begins

We got this…By the way, you so sexy…

Politics is politics but this next ad is so laughable it’s sickening. Women who vote for McCain given his abysmal record on a myriad of women’s right issues are setting their gender back pre 1921. It’s gonna be interesting when Hillary and Bill speak at the convention this week. Watch the convention people because if you don’t, you might miss something. This is going to be a landmark election on so many levels. Democrats are coming out publicly and announcing their support for McCain? Wow. McCain is using Hillary right now and Hillary is destroying her party by not speaking out against McCain..

Here’s a more thorough explanation of why she’s swinging her vote:

This cat called Hillary’s daughter ugly and well…just see for yourself below.

McCain Clinton? 2000 now?

Read my lips

12 Responses to “So Democrats Are Voting For Republicans Now? The John McCain Exploitation of Hillary Clinton Begins”

  1. michelle says:

    This is so sad! My blood is boiling.These stupid women are going to send what’s left of america straight to hell!

    This coming from me, a woman, knows that women have always been the downfall of men.

    If Obama isn’t elected because of these tactics, our country and race relations will be set back 40 years.

  2. michelle says:

    Bill and hillary are not speaking out about this crap. They can forget about any positive legacy in the black community. The party is being destroyed and all they are doing is releasing written statements from their spokesmen, this is BS!

    I got news for you stupid women. If Obama is not elected and Hillary tries to run in 2012, she will not win. Unlike you asses, we would not lower ourselves to vote republican. We will just stay home. Obama ran a clean race while Hillery was telling lies about sniper fire!

  3. michelle says:

    Anything short of Hillary and Bill holding a press conference together before they speak at the convention is telling the rest of us that they are happy about being used by the republicans. Everyone knows they will say the right things at the convention. Well I’m not stupid. Bill and Hillary you can’t fool me!

  4. Miranda says:

    Michelle these are people so blinded by their own sense of entitlement that nothing short of Barack Obama getting up on stage on Thursday night and rescinding the nomination and asking everyone to join him in getting Billary elected will get thru their muddled heads. They don’t care about fairness or logic, they care that a nigger had the audacity to beat Miss Hillary as if he is somehow better than she is. They care that everyday he doesn’t publicly announce how sorry he is for looking her in the eyes, how dare he! He knows he’s supposed to look down. They are so blinded by their own inability to wrap their heads around how this happened, that they blame Obama for Billary’s campaign being in debt. How could that spearchucker stay in the race just because he was in the lead?? Its his fault Miss Hillary had to go down to the First National and write herself a check made out to cash to the tune of $12 million dollars. Everything that went wrong with Miss Hillary’s campaign is that darkie’s fault. Who does he think he is? He doesn’t know his place.

    That’s how those numbnuts think. You shouldn’t even try to understand that kind of foolishness. Can’t make sense out of nonsense.

  5. michelle says:


    Well said as always!

  6. Temple3 says:

    The only reason Bill and Hillary get any love from Black folks is because those people don’t actually know who they are and what they’ve done. They’re easy to love (on a certain level). He’s plays the sax. He sexes up Negro reporters. She’s a woman. It’s all so nice – until you actually look under the covers. Once you do that, you’ll see that he’s at least as bad as the rest.

    As to this question of who is using whom, John McCain is not using Hillary Clinton. She’s using him. Her only hope to ever live at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue again is if McCain wins, has an unremarkable presidency and facilitates her rise in 2012. If Obama wins, she’s ass out. If he’s great, he’s getting re-elected. If he’s awful, a Republican is going to win. McCain couldn’t use her if he tried. There ain’t that much Cialis in the world. But she and Slick Willie are certainly using McCain and the Republicans.

    As for these women who want to switch parties, it makes perfect sense. These women are playing a biology game – not a politics game. Like Hillary, their power derives from their proximity to power – in other words, it derives from men. The hustle and flow is simply to elect “one of our own.” And, that’s in a pure biological sense – not an ideological sense. These women who would “switch” parties have never had a meaningful ideological position of their own. Even Hillary switched parties. It’s all about riding the Dick Du’Jour to ensure a seat at the table. Obama’s apparatus, to their minds, is firmly in another camp and these women feel locked out and irrelevant.

    They’re not actually Democrats. They’re appendages about to get cut off.

  7. Mizzo says:

    Well said brotha. I see your point about Hillary but when McCain puts ads on TV with Hillary supporters riding his jock…it’s all about him.

  8. Temple3 says:

    Those ads aren’t about McCain per se. Those ads are about the psychological distance those women feel from Barack’s biology. They had an affinity for Hillary’s biology and retain one for McCain’s. McCain could be Hitler incarnate and it wouldn’t matter.

    These women have already been married to Nazis. They’ve already given birth to them. They’ve even rejected them for the comfort of other women — only to ultimately surrender to the military power these Nazis have put down.

    Barack represents a land of political irrelevance where they are neither wife nor mother nor sister nor voter. Now, this is all in their minds. Barack’s momma’s every bit as white as Ms. Ann down the street, but she’s a little bit different, isn’t she.

    The ads, as I understand them, is about what you said up top – entitlement. That entitlement is based on the very simply notion (speaking psychologically, of course), “If I’m f%@@# you, how can you push me aside for this man – and a Black man at that?” These women were not at the forefront of affirming women’s rights domestically or internationally. If they were, it would have put them at odds with their husbands, brothers and sons a long time ago.

    They wouldn’t be down with Black women serving as domestics walking their little crumb snatchers to the park. They wouldn’t have Latina maids cleaning their homes for relative crumbs. And they certainly wouldn’t refuse to support the organization of poor women’s labor (as unionized). Nope, this is a whole nother animal.

    They’re on some bullshit and just about everyone knows it. Don’t let the “Liberal” pedigree fool you. This is all about a Bed Room check to assess the true and enduring value of the punani. They don’t seem to know that it’s a buyer’s market and that prices are way, way down.

  9. Joesaxy says:

    To all,

    I wanted to call your attention to an article that Tim Wise wrote about this very phenomenon a few months back. You can read this article for yourself at:

  10. Mizzo says:

    LOL. Loved the last paragraph.

    I’m in total agreement with you. The reticence of what is real–and what they can’t say–is why these ads were signed off on.

    The gloves are off now, so everything goes. It’s not 1967 so their coded message has been tempered with 2000 now “tact”.

    It’s crazy and also ironic this election has put those psychological and biological affinities you speak of on blast.

    It’s about time!

    Those women put on the pretty face in public but pull nigger cards (with unapologetic ignorant minds in front of those servants) behind closed doors and there’s something inherently evil in that.

    It’s almost an informal plebiscite of sorts that naturally kicks in when Obama does or says this and doesn’t do that.

    Maybe that’s why he’s playing good in all of this.

    Listening to the folk on MSNBC speak about this election is very interesting. Interesting in the realm the conversations they are having are as fake as fake is fake.

    Why don’t people just call afraid, afraid so we can all just move on?

    To me personally, this election represents a watershed moment that advances thought. I have to view it as such. The corruption of politics is a sad and sorry state because when these BAN want to pout, they break out the pink socks and flip flops like it’s nobody’s business.

    JoeSaxy thanks for the link. I’d forgotten about that piece. This is what it’s all about here:

    You’re not threatening to vote for the woman, or even the feminist woman. Rather, you are threatening to vote for the white man, and to reject not only the black man who you feel stole Clinton’s birthright, but even the black woman in the race. And I wonder why? Could it be…?

    See, I told you your whiteness was showing.

    And now for a third question, and this is the biggie, so please take your time with it: How is it that you have managed to hold your nose all these years, just like a lot of us on the left, and vote for Democrats who we knew were horribly inadequate–Kerry, Gore, Clinton, Dukakis, right on down the uninspiring line–and yet, apparently can’t bring yourself to vote for Barack Obama? A man who, for all of his shortcomings (and there are several, as with all candidates put up by either of the two major corporate parties) is surely more progressive than any of those just mentioned. And how are we to understand that refusal–this sudden line in the proverbial sand–other than as a racist slap at a black man? You will vote for white men year after year after year–and are threatening to vote for another one just to make a point–but can’t bring yourself to vote for a black man, whose political views come much closer to your own, in all likelihood, than do the views of any of the white men you’ve supported before. How, other than as an act of racism, or perhaps as evidence of political insanity, is one to interpret such a thing?

    See, black folks would have sucked it up, like they’ve had to do forever, and voted for Clinton had it come down to that. Indeed, they were on board the Hillary train early on, convinced that Obama had no chance to win and hoping for change, any change, from the reactionary agenda that has been so prevalent for so long in this culture. They would have supported the white woman–hell, for many black folks, before Obama showed his mettle they were downright excited to do so–but you won’t support the black man. And yet you have the audacity to insist that it is you who are the most loyal constituency of the Democratic Party, and the one before whom Party leaders should bow down, and whose feet must be kissed?

    Your whiteness is showing.

  11. Temple3 says:

    I think we’re talking about a small minority of white women. You’ve seen the MSNBC poll. It’s a classic group of Gen X strivers who feel their time has come. It has…in the board room.

  12. Eric Daniels says:

    Hillary lost this campaign fair and square ….. White Feminazi Rage the entitlement of Hillary Rodham Clinton

    I quess Black Men can’t win in this country, Obama marries a strong Black Woman is a parent to two little black girls and his white mother is his greatest influence intellectually and he has not parlayed his race into any advantage and now Ferraro is saying he has played the race and sex card. I quess Geraldine is still pissed at the Black Guy who screwed her in college and didn’t return the phone call afterwards.

    Maybe Hillary Clinton and her campaign should accept responsibility for ASSuming she was the “chosen one” and didn’t have to work to secure her nomination and got outworked by Obama and his team. That is called getting played and instead of accepting responsibility for their terrible showing they blame Obama associates for using race and sex. The Clinton’s should have muzzled Ferraro, Steinem, and Robert Johnson for their stupid polarizing comments (that’s the reason they lost the black vote in the first place)and ran on her ideas and she would have been the nominee by a landslide.
    Well I have news for Ferraro, the Feminists black and white and White Ethnics voters who will either 1. stay home 2. vote for McCain

    1. Roe v. Wade/equal pay (overturned)
    2. Health Care (not in a GOP administration)
    3. Immigration reform (to satisfy big biz)
    4. Iraq (another Vietnam)
    5. World War III (invade Iran and all hell breaks loose)

    You can say all you want about the GOP, but they stay united and will have the holy trifecta they have craved for 50 years without doing a damn thing. In a year they were supposed to lose VERY badly in the general election and congressional campaign the Dems have self- destructed by their hidden racist interparty agendas for the whole world to see. Well like I said they will get everything they wanted in Mc Cain nominating 2-3 justices and they will achieve so impossible in the next four years.

    1. They have made race largely symbolic with no legal meat to fight injustice or redress of civil rights violations

    2 They ended the war on poverty and rolled back “The New Deal” and “Great Society” and now it’s the PIC (prison industrial complex) and other controlled measures

    3. They will if Mc Cain gets elected to nominate 2-3 judges and have control over the courts for the next 50 years, and will finally end Roe v. Wade and will make the Women’s movement largely symbolic.

    Ball in the Dems court!! but the white femnzais with their white privilege and rural and ethnic whites with their fear of black people will never stay united to vote for Obama, there is a rule of thumb that even if the other person is the nominee you vote out of party loyalty because the other idiot agrees with 90% of your party platform regardless if there a brutal campaign. I would not have believed this in January but Mc Cain will be the POTUS by default and Democratic idiocy.