<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin: The Pitbull With Lipstick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/</link>
	<description>Bangin’ and Scorin’ Every Trip Down the Floor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arlene</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16855</link>
		<dc:creator>Arlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16855</guid>
		<description>The RNC was a disgrace.  When Governor Palin falls, she&#039;s gonna come down hard.  Gulianni and the rest of those folks were obviosuly smoking something.  They&#039;ve kept her hiding in the Carl Rove Cave filling her head with the power and the glory!  the shit&#039;s gonna hit the fan and it&#039;s all coming back in Palin&#039;s face.  But at least she&#039;ll have all of that out of the way by 2012.  READ on....

Pit bull, lipstick, and pigs  What a disgrace for politics in general.  It&#039;s evident that the main stream news media is the &quot;Third Party.&quot;  For me, Friday, September 12 show &quot;The View, &quot; was by far the most compelling, showing ,sign that straight up questions to these candiates does not have to be so agenda driven.  
These women had the gonads to confront John Mcshame for his dirty, dishonorable , so called approved attack ads.  Also they asked him about the real  issue, which the MSNM are&#039;nt doing.
He&#039;s hiding under Palin&#039;s skirt.  McShame will get kudos for agreeing to put Palin on the ticket and for his over-played battle cries of being a POW.  GAME OVER!!!!

Here&#039;s how I see it:  John Mcshame is not getting into the big house.  The RP is using him and Palin to bring in the base. (The fearful, jump on board the war wagon, save our country, stupid, scared of black people,white folks who buy into the belief that any of these politicians really care about them or the needs of their family) 

Obama/Biden will have a 4 year run in the big house. And yes folks, I believe Obama deserves to step into the White House, not in spite of being black, but clearly because he is black and then some!  Palin and Billary will go head to head in 2012.  Palin is being prepped for prime time by the Repubs (Newt, what a name Gingrich and Carl cunning, coniving Rove) 

In the meantime, I&#039;m going to continue on with my life as I am now.  Do work I enjoy and earn my own way through life, love, play, and accept responsibility for my every word, thought, and deed.  And that my friend is what Spiritual Freedom is for me!  Because politics will never be my savior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RNC was a disgrace.  When Governor Palin falls, she&#8217;s gonna come down hard.  Gulianni and the rest of those folks were obviosuly smoking something.  They&#8217;ve kept her hiding in the Carl Rove Cave filling her head with the power and the glory!  the shit&#8217;s gonna hit the fan and it&#8217;s all coming back in Palin&#8217;s face.  But at least she&#8217;ll have all of that out of the way by 2012.  READ on&#8230;.</p>
<p>Pit bull, lipstick, and pigs  What a disgrace for politics in general.  It&#8217;s evident that the main stream news media is the &#8220;Third Party.&#8221;  For me, Friday, September 12 show &#8220;The View, &#8221; was by far the most compelling, showing ,sign that straight up questions to these candiates does not have to be so agenda driven.<br />
These women had the gonads to confront John Mcshame for his dirty, dishonorable , so called approved attack ads.  Also they asked him about the real  issue, which the MSNM are&#8217;nt doing.<br />
He&#8217;s hiding under Palin&#8217;s skirt.  McShame will get kudos for agreeing to put Palin on the ticket and for his over-played battle cries of being a POW.  GAME OVER!!!!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how I see it:  John Mcshame is not getting into the big house.  The RP is using him and Palin to bring in the base. (The fearful, jump on board the war wagon, save our country, stupid, scared of black people,white folks who buy into the belief that any of these politicians really care about them or the needs of their family) </p>
<p>Obama/Biden will have a 4 year run in the big house. And yes folks, I believe Obama deserves to step into the White House, not in spite of being black, but clearly because he is black and then some!  Palin and Billary will go head to head in 2012.  Palin is being prepped for prime time by the Repubs (Newt, what a name Gingrich and Carl cunning, coniving Rove) </p>
<p>In the meantime, I&#8217;m going to continue on with my life as I am now.  Do work I enjoy and earn my own way through life, love, play, and accept responsibility for my every word, thought, and deed.  And that my friend is what Spiritual Freedom is for me!  Because politics will never be my savior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: origin</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16642</link>
		<dc:creator>origin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16642</guid>
		<description>&quot;or that she is a pretty white girl and you can’t date her.&quot;

HAHA............LOL!!!

Ignore this fool Mizzo.

This was the funniest thing I have read in awhile. I swear Elliot you need to do stand up comedy. 

Sites that hate white men....what is that like 3 sites??

Hell there are like 4 billion sites that hate on people of color.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;or that she is a pretty white girl and you can’t date her.&#8221;</p>
<p>HAHA&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;LOL!!!</p>
<p>Ignore this fool Mizzo.</p>
<p>This was the funniest thing I have read in awhile. I swear Elliot you need to do stand up comedy. </p>
<p>Sites that hate white men&#8230;.what is that like 3 sites??</p>
<p>Hell there are like 4 billion sites that hate on people of color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mizzo</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16636</link>
		<dc:creator>Mizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16636</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re joking right? That&#039;s a ridiculous comment. I see you&#039;ve been blasting the hate aid as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re joking right? That&#8217;s a ridiculous comment. I see you&#8217;ve been blasting the hate aid as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16630</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16630</guid>
		<description>Mizzo,

Yes, it has been a while.  Seems like not much has changed.  I had to take a break from all the sites filled with hatred for all things white (hatred for white men that is...don&#039;t want to offend any of you that date...nah, never mind).

I truly don&#039;t know if you guys are mad that Obama is finally being exposed and his complete lack of experience is scaring most people or that she is a pretty white girl and you can&#039;t date her.   
That has always been what I find most amusing and always will.  hehehe.  I hate white men...but I looove white women!!

Punks!  

Holla</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mizzo,</p>
<p>Yes, it has been a while.  Seems like not much has changed.  I had to take a break from all the sites filled with hatred for all things white (hatred for white men that is&#8230;don&#8217;t want to offend any of you that date&#8230;nah, never mind).</p>
<p>I truly don&#8217;t know if you guys are mad that Obama is finally being exposed and his complete lack of experience is scaring most people or that she is a pretty white girl and you can&#8217;t date her.<br />
That has always been what I find most amusing and always will.  hehehe.  I hate white men&#8230;but I looove white women!!</p>
<p>Punks!  </p>
<p>Holla</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidMac</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16557</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16557</guid>
		<description>Alright Miranda, lets try again.

http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/attachments/1297.pdf

These are the election numbers for 2000 and 2004. It also has the 527 group discloures for 2004, which is the first year that it was required to be disclosed. 

This is the link for 527 estimated spending, a very conservative estimate, in 2000.

http://www.politicalaccountability.net/files/cpa%20-%20wall%20street%20journal%20-%20interest%20groups%20gain%20in%20election%20cash%20quest%20-%2012-19-07%20(2).pdf

Lets do the math, but first we are going to divide the 527 cash for 2000. The amount is estimated to be 260 million dollars. In 2004 the Dems collected 72% of the total 527 money, so we are going to give them 70% of the cash in 2000 and assume it increased even more in 2004.

Estimated Democrate 527 funds in 2000 - 182,000,000
Estimated Republican 527 funds in 2000 - 78,000,000

Official 2000 Election Stats
DNC 2000
-Hard and Soft money - 458.1 Million

RNC 2000
-Hard and soft money - 611.5 Million

Speculated Total money for DNC in 2000 - 640.1
Speculated Total money for RNC in 2000 - 689.5

Repubs have slight money advantage of 49.4 mil.

========================

2004 Official Stats

DNC Hard money + 527 = 580.7 + 241.8 = 822.5
RNC Hard money + 527 = 632.5 + 93 = 725.5

In 2004 DNC outspent RNC by 97 million dollars.

----------------------

So there were go, in general my statements are verified by statistics. RNC outspent the DNC in 2000. In 2004 DNC outspent the RNC by a great deal, almost 100 million.

Want to try again Miranda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright Miranda, lets try again.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/attachments/1297.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/attachments/1297.pdf</a></p>
<p>These are the election numbers for 2000 and 2004. It also has the 527 group discloures for 2004, which is the first year that it was required to be disclosed. </p>
<p>This is the link for 527 estimated spending, a very conservative estimate, in 2000.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politicalaccountability.net/files/cpa%20-%20wall%20street%20journal%20-%20interest%20groups%20gain%20in%20election%20cash%20quest%20-%2012-19-07%20(2).pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.politicalaccountability.net/files/cpa%20-%20wall%20street%20journal%20-%20interest%20groups%20gain%20in%20election%20cash%20quest%20-%2012-19-07%20(2).pdf</a></p>
<p>Lets do the math, but first we are going to divide the 527 cash for 2000. The amount is estimated to be 260 million dollars. In 2004 the Dems collected 72% of the total 527 money, so we are going to give them 70% of the cash in 2000 and assume it increased even more in 2004.</p>
<p>Estimated Democrate 527 funds in 2000 &#8211; 182,000,000<br />
Estimated Republican 527 funds in 2000 &#8211; 78,000,000</p>
<p>Official 2000 Election Stats<br />
DNC 2000<br />
-Hard and Soft money &#8211; 458.1 Million</p>
<p>RNC 2000<br />
-Hard and soft money &#8211; 611.5 Million</p>
<p>Speculated Total money for DNC in 2000 &#8211; 640.1<br />
Speculated Total money for RNC in 2000 &#8211; 689.5</p>
<p>Repubs have slight money advantage of 49.4 mil.</p>
<p>========================</p>
<p>2004 Official Stats</p>
<p>DNC Hard money + 527 = 580.7 + 241.8 = 822.5<br />
RNC Hard money + 527 = 632.5 + 93 = 725.5</p>
<p>In 2004 DNC outspent RNC by 97 million dollars.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>So there were go, in general my statements are verified by statistics. RNC outspent the DNC in 2000. In 2004 DNC outspent the RNC by a great deal, almost 100 million.</p>
<p>Want to try again Miranda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16530</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16530</guid>
		<description>Davidmac, again you look retarded. I specifically asked what numbers you were referring too.....and again, there are all kinds of groups that must report to the FEC, so why didn&#039;t you link that inormation?? Because you know your mentor Rove is lying? Could that be it??  Kerry did not have even close to the amount of the Bush machine - by the way you can look up what the DNC had compared to the RNC on the FEC&#039;s website too - I guess you can just pull up something out of your ass and we&#039;re all supposed to believe it?? LMAO! Well that explains why your only source is that of an interview with Karl Rove. You should stop pretending to be even semi-intelligent, its obviously too hard a task and I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve given yourself a migraine. Provide a credible link (which doesn&#039;t exist, I&#039;m just daring you to show everyone how much of a punk you are). Go ahead, double dare you. If you don&#039;t, you&#039;re a big ole punk. Next comment to this better be all the links of the reportable information, or you&#039;re just a sorry azz punk!! LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davidmac, again you look retarded. I specifically asked what numbers you were referring too&#8230;..and again, there are all kinds of groups that must report to the FEC, so why didn&#8217;t you link that inormation?? Because you know your mentor Rove is lying? Could that be it??  Kerry did not have even close to the amount of the Bush machine &#8211; by the way you can look up what the DNC had compared to the RNC on the FEC&#8217;s website too &#8211; I guess you can just pull up something out of your ass and we&#8217;re all supposed to believe it?? LMAO! Well that explains why your only source is that of an interview with Karl Rove. You should stop pretending to be even semi-intelligent, its obviously too hard a task and I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve given yourself a migraine. Provide a credible link (which doesn&#8217;t exist, I&#8217;m just daring you to show everyone how much of a punk you are). Go ahead, double dare you. If you don&#8217;t, you&#8217;re a big ole punk. Next comment to this better be all the links of the reportable information, or you&#8217;re just a sorry azz punk!! LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidMac</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16526</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16526</guid>
		<description>@Miranda

You can&#039;t be foolish enough to really believe that only 94 million was used in a Presidential election. LOL. You just made yourself look like a fool.

Two points
-Rove&#039;s comment was refering to 2004 election, that was Kerry vs. Bush, and it includes 527, Kerry&#039;s Presidential team, and the DNC, compared to the same for the Republicans. You may hate it but the fact is last election the Republicans were heavily outspent.

-The numbers for the 2000 election that I gave were not from Rove, learn to read, they were from a third party, that was accounting for soft money.

I know you really think you made a point, but it would suit you to actually read what people post, use your head, and critically think about your argument, if ou are going to try to dbate me. Anything less leaves you looking foolish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miranda</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t be foolish enough to really believe that only 94 million was used in a Presidential election. LOL. You just made yourself look like a fool.</p>
<p>Two points<br />
-Rove&#8217;s comment was refering to 2004 election, that was Kerry vs. Bush, and it includes 527, Kerry&#8217;s Presidential team, and the DNC, compared to the same for the Republicans. You may hate it but the fact is last election the Republicans were heavily outspent.</p>
<p>-The numbers for the 2000 election that I gave were not from Rove, learn to read, they were from a third party, that was accounting for soft money.</p>
<p>I know you really think you made a point, but it would suit you to actually read what people post, use your head, and critically think about your argument, if ou are going to try to dbate me. Anything less leaves you looking foolish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16489</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16489</guid>
		<description>Well it doesn&#039;t even bear reading the rest of your tripe since you linked to an interview with Karl Rove as your &quot;proof&quot; of the Dems vs GOP spending in 2000.....you&#039;re an idiot. Thanks for playing. Its like you don&#039;t even know what the Federal Election Commission is...do you? I mean, did you really think you could link an interview with fathead Rove as some sort of confirmation? Seriously? Really? Oh well...this has to be done. Now given that both campaigns accepted public financing, would you like for me to believe that Gore&#039;s campaign raised that ridiculous amount cited by your lying azz mentor in less than 30 days from the date of this?
http://www.fec.gov/finance/precm8.htm

Gee, now anybody who was still giving you the benefit of the doubt has their suspicions confirmed. You&#039;re a numbnut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it doesn&#8217;t even bear reading the rest of your tripe since you linked to an interview with Karl Rove as your &#8220;proof&#8221; of the Dems vs GOP spending in 2000&#8230;..you&#8217;re an idiot. Thanks for playing. Its like you don&#8217;t even know what the Federal Election Commission is&#8230;do you? I mean, did you really think you could link an interview with fathead Rove as some sort of confirmation? Seriously? Really? Oh well&#8230;this has to be done. Now given that both campaigns accepted public financing, would you like for me to believe that Gore&#8217;s campaign raised that ridiculous amount cited by your lying azz mentor in less than 30 days from the date of this?<br />
<a href="http://www.fec.gov/finance/precm8.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fec.gov/finance/precm8.htm</a></p>
<p>Gee, now anybody who was still giving you the benefit of the doubt has their suspicions confirmed. You&#8217;re a numbnut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidMac</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16482</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16482</guid>
		<description>@Miranda

1)2004 Election - Dems OUTSPENT RNC by 119 million http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,377208,00.html

2000 Election - &quot;RNC and DNC spent equal amounts with Republicans having a negligible 4 million dollar advantage http://books.google.com/books?id=pza4Kc7C78YC&amp;pg=PA38&amp;lpg=PA38&amp;dq=DNC+spending+in+2000&amp;source=web&amp;ots=yV-p3crtRs&amp;sig=swlokvSgMTmxkuQlS5vNSA9OmYs&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ct=result

See its easy to argue when you have facts, you should try it some times. ;)

2) Palin is a nitwit ? How so? Oh just more talk from a damaged bitter black women struggling for relevance in society and looking  for it in Obama getting elected. You are pretty sad.
-She said she put the plane on eBay, not that she sold it on eBay, sad that you have to nitpick so heavily, I wonder what would happen if I did the same to Obama, would you cry and say I&#039;m targeting him? Yeah you would. ;) She did sell the plane though. http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/story/9238727p-9154250c.html
-As for earmarks, lobbying, and troopergate. I agree she is lying about all those issues and is not conservative at all and she was dead wrong and abused authority in TrooperGate. How this equates to being a nitwit, I don&#039;t know.
-Why would it be ignorant for her to have a child with down&#039;s syndrome? You think all life shouldn&#039;t be given a chance, you think you have the right to force a woman to get an abortion? You have an extremely distrubing way of thinking, I&#039;m glad a great deal of women in this country do not think like you fringe liberal leftist, as for it not being her child why wouldn&#039;t it be? I guess if you want to play that game, how do we know Obama was not born in Nigeria and isn&#039;t really a Muslim terrorist.
-As for the flying after her water broke, her child&#039;s life was never in danger and she was cleared to fly by a physician in Texas. Wow how pathetic it must be to try to scrape the barrel to tarnish Palin because she is now more popular than Obama. LOL. http://www.newsminer.com/news/2008/apr/22/palins-flight-labor-falls-under-scrutiny/

3) Those people at the Ron Paul rally were indeed kooks, they actually had an expose on them in Reason, http://www.reason.com/news/show/128548.html , they are far from the base of the Republican party. When did the GOP hate Hollywood? Source. So what that they used background music and pictures from the West Wing? Relevant argument please, Miranda, you are losing it. ;) 
-Electoral College, Obama&#039;s lead, as of 08/22, dropped significantly according to Rasmussen. From 210 -165 Obama to 193-183 Obama, this was before Republican Convention, so look for it to get worse. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/election_2008_electoral_college_update


----
At the end of the day Miranda, you really have to do better if you want to debate a topic, being a typical woman and getting all emotional and irrational is not going to help you in a logical debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miranda</p>
<p>1)2004 Election &#8211; Dems OUTSPENT RNC by 119 million <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,377208,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,377208,00.html</a></p>
<p>2000 Election &#8211; &#8220;RNC and DNC spent equal amounts with Republicans having a negligible 4 million dollar advantage <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=pza4Kc7C78YC&#038;pg=PA38&#038;lpg=PA38&#038;dq=DNC+spending+in+2000&#038;source=web&#038;ots=yV-p3crtRs&#038;sig=swlokvSgMTmxkuQlS5vNSA9OmYs&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=book_result&#038;resnum=1&#038;ct=result" rel="nofollow">http://books.google.com/books?id=pza4Kc7C78YC&#038;pg=PA38&#038;lpg=PA38&#038;dq=DNC+spending+in+2000&#038;source=web&#038;ots=yV-p3crtRs&#038;sig=swlokvSgMTmxkuQlS5vNSA9OmYs&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=book_result&#038;resnum=1&#038;ct=result</a></p>
<p>See its easy to argue when you have facts, you should try it some times. <img src='http://thestartingfive.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>2) Palin is a nitwit ? How so? Oh just more talk from a damaged bitter black women struggling for relevance in society and looking  for it in Obama getting elected. You are pretty sad.<br />
-She said she put the plane on eBay, not that she sold it on eBay, sad that you have to nitpick so heavily, I wonder what would happen if I did the same to Obama, would you cry and say I&#8217;m targeting him? Yeah you would. <img src='http://thestartingfive.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  She did sell the plane though. <a href="http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/story/9238727p-9154250c.html" rel="nofollow">http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/story/9238727p-9154250c.html</a><br />
-As for earmarks, lobbying, and troopergate. I agree she is lying about all those issues and is not conservative at all and she was dead wrong and abused authority in TrooperGate. How this equates to being a nitwit, I don&#8217;t know.<br />
-Why would it be ignorant for her to have a child with down&#8217;s syndrome? You think all life shouldn&#8217;t be given a chance, you think you have the right to force a woman to get an abortion? You have an extremely distrubing way of thinking, I&#8217;m glad a great deal of women in this country do not think like you fringe liberal leftist, as for it not being her child why wouldn&#8217;t it be? I guess if you want to play that game, how do we know Obama was not born in Nigeria and isn&#8217;t really a Muslim terrorist.<br />
-As for the flying after her water broke, her child&#8217;s life was never in danger and she was cleared to fly by a physician in Texas. Wow how pathetic it must be to try to scrape the barrel to tarnish Palin because she is now more popular than Obama. LOL. <a href="http://www.newsminer.com/news/2008/apr/22/palins-flight-labor-falls-under-scrutiny/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsminer.com/news/2008/apr/22/palins-flight-labor-falls-under-scrutiny/</a></p>
<p>3) Those people at the Ron Paul rally were indeed kooks, they actually had an expose on them in Reason, <a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/128548.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reason.com/news/show/128548.html</a> , they are far from the base of the Republican party. When did the GOP hate Hollywood? Source. So what that they used background music and pictures from the West Wing? Relevant argument please, Miranda, you are losing it. <img src='http://thestartingfive.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
-Electoral College, Obama&#8217;s lead, as of 08/22, dropped significantly according to Rasmussen. From 210 -165 Obama to 193-183 Obama, this was before Republican Convention, so look for it to get worse. <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/election_2008_electoral_college_update" rel="nofollow">http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/election_2008_electoral_college_update</a></p>
<p>&#8212;-<br />
At the end of the day Miranda, you really have to do better if you want to debate a topic, being a typical woman and getting all emotional and irrational is not going to help you in a logical debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16476</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16476</guid>
		<description>Davidmac wants to play the double..... wait...triple...wait...... quadruple standard game - moving the goalposts to only God knows where:

Here&#039;s a good clip Mizzo, sums up these GOP minions nicely
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184086&amp;title=sarah-palin-gender-card</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davidmac wants to play the double&#8230;.. wait&#8230;triple&#8230;wait&#8230;&#8230; quadruple standard game &#8211; moving the goalposts to only God knows where:</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a good clip Mizzo, sums up these GOP minions nicely<br />
<a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184086&#038;title=sarah-palin-gender-card" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184086&#038;title=sarah-palin-gender-card</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mizzo</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16469</link>
		<dc:creator>Mizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16469</guid>
		<description>Tell &#039;em sista!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell &#8216;em sista!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16468</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16468</guid>
		<description>LMAO...ummmm what are you citing with the notion that Dems had more money to spend in 2000 and 2004 for the presidential races? The campaign money, the party money, or both? I&#039;ll be waiting for the link.

Palin is a nitwit...from the lie about the plane sold on ebay, to the lie about the earmarks, to the lie about lobbyists, to the lies about troopergate, and would it be better to believe she&#039;s lying about her youngest child being HER child or should we just believe she&#039;s the most ignorant piece of trash mother in the country for boarding a plane for a 9 hour flight after she starts leaking amniotic fluids? Which of those options is the better one?

Oh so those 11,000 republicans were kooks?? LOL....well they certainly had more passion about Paul than anybody had about McSame! By the way, I thought the GOP hated Hollywood? So why are they using actors for their beautiful tribute videos and using the background from The West Wing for McCain&#039;s speech? Isn&#039;t that kinda embracing Hollywood? No?

What&#039;s that electoral college map looking like today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO&#8230;ummmm what are you citing with the notion that Dems had more money to spend in 2000 and 2004 for the presidential races? The campaign money, the party money, or both? I&#8217;ll be waiting for the link.</p>
<p>Palin is a nitwit&#8230;from the lie about the plane sold on ebay, to the lie about the earmarks, to the lie about lobbyists, to the lies about troopergate, and would it be better to believe she&#8217;s lying about her youngest child being HER child or should we just believe she&#8217;s the most ignorant piece of trash mother in the country for boarding a plane for a 9 hour flight after she starts leaking amniotic fluids? Which of those options is the better one?</p>
<p>Oh so those 11,000 republicans were kooks?? LOL&#8230;.well they certainly had more passion about Paul than anybody had about McSame! By the way, I thought the GOP hated Hollywood? So why are they using actors for their beautiful tribute videos and using the background from The West Wing for McCain&#8217;s speech? Isn&#8217;t that kinda embracing Hollywood? No?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s that electoral college map looking like today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidMac</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16457</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16457</guid>
		<description>@Miranda

Democrats outraised and outspent the Republicans in 2000 and 2004, but the issue isn&#039;t how much money you raise, it is about how you spend it. Republicans spending less money every year beat Dems because we know what issue Americans have close to their hearts, Dems don&#039;t they are out of touch.

As for Palin, so what, last time I checked getting a degree and being in higher education doesn&#039;t equate in any shape or form with being a great leader or executive. How about this since we like to dig up stuff.

*Obama smoked weed and admitted to using cocaine. Obama also stayed in the company of and issued praise to a man who bombed US government sites and said that he didn&#039;t do enough. Lets not also forget Obama and his nice deal with Rezko, the man with mob and criminal connections who got Obama his house below market price and the adjacent lot well below market price. How about this one, I can go on and on, but I think it is funny. When someone brings up legit criticisms of Obama&#039;s life you all scream slander and bloody murder, but you all cling to insignifficant facts of Palin&#039;s life like it actually means something. 

As for Ron Paul, those weren&#039;t Republicans out there with him, those were nothing but kooks. Crazies, like those who want to go to Gold standards, UFO conspiracy theorists, 9/11 &quot;Truthers&quot;, and other fringe groups. Sadly, Paul&#039;s revolution got co-opted by the lunatic fringe. But atleast the Republicans let free protest go on around our convention, it shows we believe in the founding principles of out country, we didn&#039;t use the city government to limit Constitutional freedom and put protestors in &quot;zones&quot; half a mile away from the convention site surrounded by barbed wire and concrete blocks. Liberal Hypocrisy at its finest though, you can do better than this Miranda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miranda</p>
<p>Democrats outraised and outspent the Republicans in 2000 and 2004, but the issue isn&#8217;t how much money you raise, it is about how you spend it. Republicans spending less money every year beat Dems because we know what issue Americans have close to their hearts, Dems don&#8217;t they are out of touch.</p>
<p>As for Palin, so what, last time I checked getting a degree and being in higher education doesn&#8217;t equate in any shape or form with being a great leader or executive. How about this since we like to dig up stuff.</p>
<p>*Obama smoked weed and admitted to using cocaine. Obama also stayed in the company of and issued praise to a man who bombed US government sites and said that he didn&#8217;t do enough. Lets not also forget Obama and his nice deal with Rezko, the man with mob and criminal connections who got Obama his house below market price and the adjacent lot well below market price. How about this one, I can go on and on, but I think it is funny. When someone brings up legit criticisms of Obama&#8217;s life you all scream slander and bloody murder, but you all cling to insignifficant facts of Palin&#8217;s life like it actually means something. </p>
<p>As for Ron Paul, those weren&#8217;t Republicans out there with him, those were nothing but kooks. Crazies, like those who want to go to Gold standards, UFO conspiracy theorists, 9/11 &#8220;Truthers&#8221;, and other fringe groups. Sadly, Paul&#8217;s revolution got co-opted by the lunatic fringe. But atleast the Republicans let free protest go on around our convention, it shows we believe in the founding principles of out country, we didn&#8217;t use the city government to limit Constitutional freedom and put protestors in &#8220;zones&#8221; half a mile away from the convention site surrounded by barbed wire and concrete blocks. Liberal Hypocrisy at its finest though, you can do better than this Miranda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16451</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16451</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure the McCain campaign is happy that after Palin&#039;s speech they raised $1 million dollars..........but I&#039;m sure the Obama campaign is even happier, because after that same speech, they got $8 million dollars.

BTW...5 colleges in 6 years is a bit much dont cha think? Is that indicative of Palin&#039;s &quot;academic&quot; experience??

LMAO!! Oh yeah.....why no coverage of the 11,000 people rallying with Ron Paul in Minnesota this week too?? 11,000 people who are disgruntled republicans....hmmmm...nobody wanted to talk to them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure the McCain campaign is happy that after Palin&#8217;s speech they raised $1 million dollars&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.but I&#8217;m sure the Obama campaign is even happier, because after that same speech, they got $8 million dollars.</p>
<p>BTW&#8230;5 colleges in 6 years is a bit much dont cha think? Is that indicative of Palin&#8217;s &#8220;academic&#8221; experience??</p>
<p>LMAO!! Oh yeah&#8230;..why no coverage of the 11,000 people rallying with Ron Paul in Minnesota this week too?? 11,000 people who are disgruntled republicans&#8230;.hmmmm&#8230;nobody wanted to talk to them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidMac</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/comment-page-1/#comment-16442</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16442</guid>
		<description>@Phil 

You are outright lying. Republican have never vilianized any unwed mother let alone &quot;black unwed mother&quot; So how about come with some fact.

There is diversity in the RNC and there is diversity in the Conservative movement. I find it funny though that the DNC has the same makeup as well as the DNC platform committee yet, I don&#039;t see you diversity police counting the number of blacks, hispanics, women, indian, and asians are in the room for them. Hypocrisy at its finest. Come back again when you have a relevant argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Phil </p>
<p>You are outright lying. Republican have never vilianized any unwed mother let alone &#8220;black unwed mother&#8221; So how about come with some fact.</p>
<p>There is diversity in the RNC and there is diversity in the Conservative movement. I find it funny though that the DNC has the same makeup as well as the DNC platform committee yet, I don&#8217;t see you diversity police counting the number of blacks, hispanics, women, indian, and asians are in the room for them. Hypocrisy at its finest. Come back again when you have a relevant argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

