<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin: The Pitbull With Lipstick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/</link>
	<description>Bangin’ and Scorin’ Every Trip Down the Floor</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arlene</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/#comment-16855</link>
		<dc:creator>Arlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16855</guid>
		<description>The RNC was a disgrace.  When Governor Palin falls, she's gonna come down hard.  Gulianni and the rest of those folks were obviosuly smoking something.  They've kept her hiding in the Carl Rove Cave filling her head with the power and the glory!  the shit's gonna hit the fan and it's all coming back in Palin's face.  But at least she'll have all of that out of the way by 2012.  READ on....

Pit bull, lipstick, and pigs  What a disgrace for politics in general.  It's evident that the main stream news media is the "Third Party."  For me, Friday, September 12 show "The View, " was by far the most compelling, showing ,sign that straight up questions to these candiates does not have to be so agenda driven.  
These women had the gonads to confront John Mcshame for his dirty, dishonorable , so called approved attack ads.  Also they asked him about the real  issue, which the MSNM are'nt doing.
He's hiding under Palin's skirt.  McShame will get kudos for agreeing to put Palin on the ticket and for his over-played battle cries of being a POW.  GAME OVER!!!!

Here's how I see it:  John Mcshame is not getting into the big house.  The RP is using him and Palin to bring in the base. (The fearful, jump on board the war wagon, save our country, stupid, scared of black people,white folks who buy into the belief that any of these politicians really care about them or the needs of their family) 

Obama/Biden will have a 4 year run in the big house. And yes folks, I believe Obama deserves to step into the White House, not in spite of being black, but clearly because he is black and then some!  Palin and Billary will go head to head in 2012.  Palin is being prepped for prime time by the Repubs (Newt, what a name Gingrich and Carl cunning, coniving Rove) 

In the meantime, I'm going to continue on with my life as I am now.  Do work I enjoy and earn my own way through life, love, play, and accept responsibility for my every word, thought, and deed.  And that my friend is what Spiritual Freedom is for me!  Because politics will never be my savior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RNC was a disgrace.  When Governor Palin falls, she&#8217;s gonna come down hard.  Gulianni and the rest of those folks were obviosuly smoking something.  They&#8217;ve kept her hiding in the Carl Rove Cave filling her head with the power and the glory!  the shit&#8217;s gonna hit the fan and it&#8217;s all coming back in Palin&#8217;s face.  But at least she&#8217;ll have all of that out of the way by 2012.  READ on&#8230;.</p>
<p>Pit bull, lipstick, and pigs  What a disgrace for politics in general.  It&#8217;s evident that the main stream news media is the &#8220;Third Party.&#8221;  For me, Friday, September 12 show &#8220;The View, &#8221; was by far the most compelling, showing ,sign that straight up questions to these candiates does not have to be so agenda driven.<br />
These women had the gonads to confront John Mcshame for his dirty, dishonorable , so called approved attack ads.  Also they asked him about the real  issue, which the MSNM are&#8217;nt doing.<br />
He&#8217;s hiding under Palin&#8217;s skirt.  McShame will get kudos for agreeing to put Palin on the ticket and for his over-played battle cries of being a POW.  GAME OVER!!!!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how I see it:  John Mcshame is not getting into the big house.  The RP is using him and Palin to bring in the base. (The fearful, jump on board the war wagon, save our country, stupid, scared of black people,white folks who buy into the belief that any of these politicians really care about them or the needs of their family) </p>
<p>Obama/Biden will have a 4 year run in the big house. And yes folks, I believe Obama deserves to step into the White House, not in spite of being black, but clearly because he is black and then some!  Palin and Billary will go head to head in 2012.  Palin is being prepped for prime time by the Repubs (Newt, what a name Gingrich and Carl cunning, coniving Rove) </p>
<p>In the meantime, I&#8217;m going to continue on with my life as I am now.  Do work I enjoy and earn my own way through life, love, play, and accept responsibility for my every word, thought, and deed.  And that my friend is what Spiritual Freedom is for me!  Because politics will never be my savior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: origin</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/#comment-16642</link>
		<dc:creator>origin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16642</guid>
		<description>"or that she is a pretty white girl and you can’t date her."

HAHA............LOL!!!

Ignore this fool Mizzo.

This was the funniest thing I have read in awhile. I swear Elliot you need to do stand up comedy. 

Sites that hate white men....what is that like 3 sites??

Hell there are like 4 billion sites that hate on people of color.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;or that she is a pretty white girl and you can’t date her.&#8221;</p>
<p>HAHA&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;LOL!!!</p>
<p>Ignore this fool Mizzo.</p>
<p>This was the funniest thing I have read in awhile. I swear Elliot you need to do stand up comedy. </p>
<p>Sites that hate white men&#8230;.what is that like 3 sites??</p>
<p>Hell there are like 4 billion sites that hate on people of color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mizzo</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/#comment-16636</link>
		<dc:creator>Mizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16636</guid>
		<description>You're joking right? That's a ridiculous comment. I see you've been blasting the hate aid as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re joking right? That&#8217;s a ridiculous comment. I see you&#8217;ve been blasting the hate aid as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/#comment-16630</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16630</guid>
		<description>Mizzo,

Yes, it has been a while.  Seems like not much has changed.  I had to take a break from all the sites filled with hatred for all things white (hatred for white men that is...don't want to offend any of you that date...nah, never mind).

I truly don't know if you guys are mad that Obama is finally being exposed and his complete lack of experience is scaring most people or that she is a pretty white girl and you can't date her.   
That has always been what I find most amusing and always will.  hehehe.  I hate white men...but I looove white women!!

Punks!  

Holla</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mizzo,</p>
<p>Yes, it has been a while.  Seems like not much has changed.  I had to take a break from all the sites filled with hatred for all things white (hatred for white men that is&#8230;don&#8217;t want to offend any of you that date&#8230;nah, never mind).</p>
<p>I truly don&#8217;t know if you guys are mad that Obama is finally being exposed and his complete lack of experience is scaring most people or that she is a pretty white girl and you can&#8217;t date her.<br />
That has always been what I find most amusing and always will.  hehehe.  I hate white men&#8230;but I looove white women!!</p>
<p>Punks!  </p>
<p>Holla</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidMac</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/#comment-16557</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16557</guid>
		<description>Alright Miranda, lets try again.

http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/attachments/1297.pdf

These are the election numbers for 2000 and 2004. It also has the 527 group discloures for 2004, which is the first year that it was required to be disclosed. 

This is the link for 527 estimated spending, a very conservative estimate, in 2000.

http://www.politicalaccountability.net/files/cpa%20-%20wall%20street%20journal%20-%20interest%20groups%20gain%20in%20election%20cash%20quest%20-%2012-19-07%20(2).pdf

Lets do the math, but first we are going to divide the 527 cash for 2000. The amount is estimated to be 260 million dollars. In 2004 the Dems collected 72% of the total 527 money, so we are going to give them 70% of the cash in 2000 and assume it increased even more in 2004.

Estimated Democrate 527 funds in 2000 - 182,000,000
Estimated Republican 527 funds in 2000 - 78,000,000

Official 2000 Election Stats
DNC 2000
-Hard and Soft money - 458.1 Million

RNC 2000
-Hard and soft money - 611.5 Million

Speculated Total money for DNC in 2000 - 640.1
Speculated Total money for RNC in 2000 - 689.5

Repubs have slight money advantage of 49.4 mil.

========================

2004 Official Stats

DNC Hard money + 527 = 580.7 + 241.8 = 822.5
RNC Hard money + 527 = 632.5 + 93 = 725.5

In 2004 DNC outspent RNC by 97 million dollars.

----------------------

So there were go, in general my statements are verified by statistics. RNC outspent the DNC in 2000. In 2004 DNC outspent the RNC by a great deal, almost 100 million.

Want to try again Miranda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright Miranda, lets try again.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/attachments/1297.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/attachments/1297.pdf</a></p>
<p>These are the election numbers for 2000 and 2004. It also has the 527 group discloures for 2004, which is the first year that it was required to be disclosed. </p>
<p>This is the link for 527 estimated spending, a very conservative estimate, in 2000.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politicalaccountability.net/files/cpa%20-%20wall%20street%20journal%20-%20interest%20groups%20gain%20in%20election%20cash%20quest%20-%2012-19-07%20" rel="nofollow">http://www.politicalaccountability.net/files/cpa%20-%20wall%20street%20journal%20-%20interest%20groups%20gain%20in%20election%20cash%20quest%20-%2012-19-07%20</a>(2).pdf</p>
<p>Lets do the math, but first we are going to divide the 527 cash for 2000. The amount is estimated to be 260 million dollars. In 2004 the Dems collected 72% of the total 527 money, so we are going to give them 70% of the cash in 2000 and assume it increased even more in 2004.</p>
<p>Estimated Democrate 527 funds in 2000 - 182,000,000<br />
Estimated Republican 527 funds in 2000 - 78,000,000</p>
<p>Official 2000 Election Stats<br />
DNC 2000<br />
-Hard and Soft money - 458.1 Million</p>
<p>RNC 2000<br />
-Hard and soft money - 611.5 Million</p>
<p>Speculated Total money for DNC in 2000 - 640.1<br />
Speculated Total money for RNC in 2000 - 689.5</p>
<p>Repubs have slight money advantage of 49.4 mil.</p>
<p>========================</p>
<p>2004 Official Stats</p>
<p>DNC Hard money + 527 = 580.7 + 241.8 = 822.5<br />
RNC Hard money + 527 = 632.5 + 93 = 725.5</p>
<p>In 2004 DNC outspent RNC by 97 million dollars.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>So there were go, in general my statements are verified by statistics. RNC outspent the DNC in 2000. In 2004 DNC outspent the RNC by a great deal, almost 100 million.</p>
<p>Want to try again Miranda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/#comment-16530</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16530</guid>
		<description>Davidmac, again you look retarded. I specifically asked what numbers you were referring too.....and again, there are all kinds of groups that must report to the FEC, so why didn't you link that inormation?? Because you know your mentor Rove is lying? Could that be it??  Kerry did not have even close to the amount of the Bush machine - by the way you can look up what the DNC had compared to the RNC on the FEC's website too - I guess you can just pull up something out of your ass and we're all supposed to believe it?? LMAO! Well that explains why your only source is that of an interview with Karl Rove. You should stop pretending to be even semi-intelligent, its obviously too hard a task and I'm sure you've given yourself a migraine. Provide a credible link (which doesn't exist, I'm just daring you to show everyone how much of a punk you are). Go ahead, double dare you. If you don't, you're a big ole punk. Next comment to this better be all the links of the reportable information, or you're just a sorry azz punk!! LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davidmac, again you look retarded. I specifically asked what numbers you were referring too&#8230;..and again, there are all kinds of groups that must report to the FEC, so why didn&#8217;t you link that inormation?? Because you know your mentor Rove is lying? Could that be it??  Kerry did not have even close to the amount of the Bush machine - by the way you can look up what the DNC had compared to the RNC on the FEC&#8217;s website too - I guess you can just pull up something out of your ass and we&#8217;re all supposed to believe it?? LMAO! Well that explains why your only source is that of an interview with Karl Rove. You should stop pretending to be even semi-intelligent, its obviously too hard a task and I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve given yourself a migraine. Provide a credible link (which doesn&#8217;t exist, I&#8217;m just daring you to show everyone how much of a punk you are). Go ahead, double dare you. If you don&#8217;t, you&#8217;re a big ole punk. Next comment to this better be all the links of the reportable information, or you&#8217;re just a sorry azz punk!! LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidMac</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2008/09/04/sarah-palin-the-pitbull-with-lipstick/#comment-16526</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=1465#comment-16526</guid>
		<description>@Miranda

You can't be foolish enough to really believe that only 94 million was used in a Presidential election. LOL. You just made yourself look like a fool.

Two points
-Rove's comment was refering to 2004 election, that was Kerry vs. Bush, and it includes 527, Kerry's Presidential team, and the DNC, compared to the same for the Republicans. You may hate it but the fact is last election the Republicans were heavily outspent.

-The numbers for the 2000 election that I gave were not from Rove, learn to read, they were from a third party, that was accounting for soft money.

I know you really think you made a point, but it would suit you to actually read what people post, use your head, and critically think about your argument, if ou are going to try to dbate me. Anything less leaves you looking foolish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miranda</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t be foolish enough to really believe that only 94 million was used in a Presidential election. LOL. You just made yourself look like a fool.</p>
<p>Two points<br />
-Rove&#8217;s comment was refering to 2004 election, that was Kerry vs. Bush, and it includes 527, Kerry&#8217;s Presidential team, and the DNC, compared to the same for the Republicans. You may hate it but the fact is last election the Republicans were heavily outspent.</p>
<p>-The numbers for the 2000 election that I gave were not from Rove, learn to read, they were from a third party, that was accounting for soft money.</p>
<p>I know you really think you made a point, but it would suit you to actually read what people post, use your head, and critically think about your argument, if ou are going to try to dbate me. Anything less leaves you looking foolish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
