<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Starting Five AFC and NFC Championship Picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/</link>
	<description>Bangin’ and Scorin’ Every Trip Down the Floor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temple3</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-2/#comment-22596</link>
		<dc:creator>Temple3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22596</guid>
		<description>If it makes you feel any better, the Steelers lost SB XXX in 1995 and then went on to lose 3 AFC Championship games (as home favorites) before winning ten years later in SB XL.  

Cowher changed his approach in 2005 and it worked.  Reid has to get the message, or get in the wind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it makes you feel any better, the Steelers lost SB XXX in 1995 and then went on to lose 3 AFC Championship games (as home favorites) before winning ten years later in SB XL.  </p>
<p>Cowher changed his approach in 2005 and it worked.  Reid has to get the message, or get in the wind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mizzo</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-2/#comment-22591</link>
		<dc:creator>Mizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22591</guid>
		<description>Moon and Marino are the first to come to mind. I think McNabb is dynamic because his win total would be higher if he just had somebody to catch the damn ball in crucial situations.

I&#039;m really tired of talking about the same shit for 10 years....10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moon and Marino are the first to come to mind. I think McNabb is dynamic because his win total would be higher if he just had somebody to catch the damn ball in crucial situations.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really tired of talking about the same shit for 10 years&#8230;.10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temple3</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-2/#comment-22589</link>
		<dc:creator>Temple3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22589</guid>
		<description>By the way, I think my primary point is that you and Kirk are both correct in your assessments of McNabb and the Eagles.  It&#039;s a subtle point, but the numbers (of all the legends of the game) reveal to me that you&#039;re both spot on in your critique.  It comes down to multiple factors: defense, the run game and overall offensive talent.  If you separate these critical factors, you find that even the legends of the game were unable to get it done - almost without exception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I think my primary point is that you and Kirk are both correct in your assessments of McNabb and the Eagles.  It&#8217;s a subtle point, but the numbers (of all the legends of the game) reveal to me that you&#8217;re both spot on in your critique.  It comes down to multiple factors: defense, the run game and overall offensive talent.  If you separate these critical factors, you find that even the legends of the game were unable to get it done &#8211; almost without exception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temple3</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-2/#comment-22588</link>
		<dc:creator>Temple3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22588</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re 37 and 28 and still doing stuff like this, you are a CAREER CRIMINAL.  You either need a cell, a serious rehab program, or some time alone in the desert or the mountains for about a decade.  

My piece on McNabb&#039;s conversation with the NFL legends is up:  Check it out when you can.  

http://temple3.wordpress.com/2009/01/22/donovan-mcnabbs-round-table-talk-with-the-legends/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re 37 and 28 and still doing stuff like this, you are a CAREER CRIMINAL.  You either need a cell, a serious rehab program, or some time alone in the desert or the mountains for about a decade.  </p>
<p>My piece on McNabb&#8217;s conversation with the NFL legends is up:  Check it out when you can.  </p>
<p><a href="http://temple3.wordpress.com/2009/01/22/donovan-mcnabbs-round-table-talk-with-the-legends/" rel="nofollow">http://temple3.wordpress.com/2009/01/22/donovan-mcnabbs-round-table-talk-with-the-legends/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mizzo</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-2/#comment-22584</link>
		<dc:creator>Mizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22584</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s why I started my last piece off like I did. Cat&#039;s were grown ass men.



&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah..uh…since my squad is landscaping their Arizona lawn in January, it’s time for a total NBA focus. Ryan Howard asking 18 million in arbitration? So what. Baseball smaseball….football forget all ya’ll. I’m ready for the rock!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s why I started my last piece off like I did. Cat&#8217;s were grown ass men.</p>
<blockquote><p>Yeah..uh…since my squad is landscaping their Arizona lawn in January, it’s time for a total NBA focus. Ryan Howard asking 18 million in arbitration? So what. Baseball smaseball….football forget all ya’ll. I’m ready for the rock!</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrandNubian</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-2/#comment-22583</link>
		<dc:creator>GrandNubian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22583</guid>
		<description>http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=txmcnabbprank&amp;prov=st&amp;type=lgns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=txmcnabbprank&#038;prov=st&#038;type=lgns" rel="nofollow">http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=txmcnabbprank&#038;prov=st&#038;type=lgns</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temple3</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-2/#comment-22579</link>
		<dc:creator>Temple3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22579</guid>
		<description>Well, to each his own.  

I remember the days when a ring (maybe 2) and being ranked #1 in catches, yards, touchdowns and knock out blocks with a single franchise made you a franchise receiver.  I&#039;m getting old...or not.

I guess I feel the same way about all the guys who didn&#039;t catch as many balls as he did this year: guys like Moss (both of them), TO, Torry Holt, Calvin Johnson, Braylon Edwards...there are more -- but like I said...I&#039;m getting old.  

Y-a-w-n!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, to each his own.  </p>
<p>I remember the days when a ring (maybe 2) and being ranked #1 in catches, yards, touchdowns and knock out blocks with a single franchise made you a franchise receiver.  I&#8217;m getting old&#8230;or not.</p>
<p>I guess I feel the same way about all the guys who didn&#8217;t catch as many balls as he did this year: guys like Moss (both of them), TO, Torry Holt, Calvin Johnson, Braylon Edwards&#8230;there are more &#8212; but like I said&#8230;I&#8217;m getting old.  </p>
<p>Y-a-w-n!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-2/#comment-22575</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22575</guid>
		<description>Well being a dolphin fan the Chris Chambers years were plagued by his inconsistency with his hands of stone, so I do know a little about dropped passes,but overall I think we&#039;ve covered all that we can on this topic, So I am done.

Temple, I guess we&#039;ll just have to disagree on this I think Hines Ward in his prime was a very good receiver, but that was awhile ago, but for what it&#039;s worth he&#039;s certainly not finesse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well being a dolphin fan the Chris Chambers years were plagued by his inconsistency with his hands of stone, so I do know a little about dropped passes,but overall I think we&#8217;ve covered all that we can on this topic, So I am done.</p>
<p>Temple, I guess we&#8217;ll just have to disagree on this I think Hines Ward in his prime was a very good receiver, but that was awhile ago, but for what it&#8217;s worth he&#8217;s certainly not finesse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temple3</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-1/#comment-22573</link>
		<dc:creator>Temple3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22573</guid>
		<description>I was gonna mind my own business, but...

Hines Ward is not a &quot;franchise receiver.&quot;  Perhaps you have your &quot;F&quot; words confused.  Maybe you meant &quot;FAST&quot; or &quot;FINESSE&quot; or &quot;FLASHY&quot; or some other largely irrelevant word in describing the craft -- but if you actually meant &quot;franchise,&quot; then you need to little more than avail yourself to his standing among other receivers within his FRANCHISE.

I know you either already know the answer or can find the answer.

So, which &quot;F&quot; word did you really mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was gonna mind my own business, but&#8230;</p>
<p>Hines Ward is not a &#8220;franchise receiver.&#8221;  Perhaps you have your &#8220;F&#8221; words confused.  Maybe you meant &#8220;FAST&#8221; or &#8220;FINESSE&#8221; or &#8220;FLASHY&#8221; or some other largely irrelevant word in describing the craft &#8212; but if you actually meant &#8220;franchise,&#8221; then you need to little more than avail yourself to his standing among other receivers within his FRANCHISE.</p>
<p>I know you either already know the answer or can find the answer.</p>
<p>So, which &#8220;F&#8221; word did you really mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mizzo</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-1/#comment-22572</link>
		<dc:creator>Mizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22572</guid>
		<description>Of course not Kirk, but if you look at the list of SB winning qb&#039;s you will see a prominence of number one receivers. Of course there are exceptions. I disagree with you over Hines Ward and Key. They are better than anything McNabb has ever had besides Owens. 

What I&#039;m saying is when you need a big catch to get you over the top a franchise receiver would make that catch or open up the field for your second level receivers to be open. 

I do know football.

He has everything else in place--despite a dinged up running back--to have won a SB but has not because he&#039;s in the pocket looking all around and no one is open. 

It&#039;s as simple as that. Yes, they have been good enough to win but they have not proved their mettle in the big games.

Why is this even an argument? Would you say the same thing about other quarterbacks?

There should not be a resistance from his organization in light of the success he had when Owens was here. 

He set a franchise record for passing yards because of Westbrook&#039;s injuries. 

Remember Kevin Curtis--who is a capable number 2--was out most of the year with a sports hernia.

Are you an Eagles fan? Have you covered the team? Been to a couple practices? Been pissed after big drops time and time again during the year? 

I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course not Kirk, but if you look at the list of SB winning qb&#8217;s you will see a prominence of number one receivers. Of course there are exceptions. I disagree with you over Hines Ward and Key. They are better than anything McNabb has ever had besides Owens. </p>
<p>What I&#8217;m saying is when you need a big catch to get you over the top a franchise receiver would make that catch or open up the field for your second level receivers to be open. </p>
<p>I do know football.</p>
<p>He has everything else in place&#8211;despite a dinged up running back&#8211;to have won a SB but has not because he&#8217;s in the pocket looking all around and no one is open. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s as simple as that. Yes, they have been good enough to win but they have not proved their mettle in the big games.</p>
<p>Why is this even an argument? Would you say the same thing about other quarterbacks?</p>
<p>There should not be a resistance from his organization in light of the success he had when Owens was here. </p>
<p>He set a franchise record for passing yards because of Westbrook&#8217;s injuries. </p>
<p>Remember Kevin Curtis&#8211;who is a capable number 2&#8211;was out most of the year with a sports hernia.</p>
<p>Are you an Eagles fan? Have you covered the team? Been to a couple practices? Been pissed after big drops time and time again during the year? </p>
<p>I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-1/#comment-22571</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22571</guid>
		<description>Get over myself? You say I put words in your mouth, and then you say I said I was the only one who is right? I never said that.

As I have said before I have no feelings for McNabb one way or another, and If you would actually read my posts as you advised me to, you&#039;ll see I have said many times that McNabb could use a franchise wr, but Wrs are not a major component to win championships as I explain further in the paragraph below, so all that hater talk should cease.

Anyone who knows anything about football would not say the key to winning championships is wide receivers, or even a franchise quarterback: Brad Johnson, Trent Dilfer, Kerry Collins, Rex Grossman, a Young Ben Roethlisberger, Eli Manning, and Jake Delhomme all of which have recently played in or won a super bowl none of which is better than McNabb. Only two of those quarterbacks had franchise WRs Eli had Plax, and Delhomme had Steve Smith (No Keyshawn,and Hines aren&#039;t franchise WRs).Could McNabb use a Franchise WR? Sure, but championships aren&#039;t built on them, so complaining about not having one is just excuse making. The key has always been running the ball, and stopping the run. 

I only mention this NFC title game because the past title games weren&#039;t brought up. It doesn&#039;t matter anyway the receivers played well enough to win and out all the people you could fault for that loss they&#039;re last on the list.

The rest of the games you mentioned don&#039;t matter because I&#039;m sure the WRs collectively played well at points during the season and well enough that the team made it to the Conference Title game, and played well enough in that game to win it,and conveiniently you left out the Super Bowl in which Donovan McNabb had an all time great receiver,and the Eagles still didn&#039;t get it done, and McNabb didn&#039;t have a particularly good game that day either, too much Chunky Soup, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get over myself? You say I put words in your mouth, and then you say I said I was the only one who is right? I never said that.</p>
<p>As I have said before I have no feelings for McNabb one way or another, and If you would actually read my posts as you advised me to, you&#8217;ll see I have said many times that McNabb could use a franchise wr, but Wrs are not a major component to win championships as I explain further in the paragraph below, so all that hater talk should cease.</p>
<p>Anyone who knows anything about football would not say the key to winning championships is wide receivers, or even a franchise quarterback: Brad Johnson, Trent Dilfer, Kerry Collins, Rex Grossman, a Young Ben Roethlisberger, Eli Manning, and Jake Delhomme all of which have recently played in or won a super bowl none of which is better than McNabb. Only two of those quarterbacks had franchise WRs Eli had Plax, and Delhomme had Steve Smith (No Keyshawn,and Hines aren&#8217;t franchise WRs).Could McNabb use a Franchise WR? Sure, but championships aren&#8217;t built on them, so complaining about not having one is just excuse making. The key has always been running the ball, and stopping the run. </p>
<p>I only mention this NFC title game because the past title games weren&#8217;t brought up. It doesn&#8217;t matter anyway the receivers played well enough to win and out all the people you could fault for that loss they&#8217;re last on the list.</p>
<p>The rest of the games you mentioned don&#8217;t matter because I&#8217;m sure the WRs collectively played well at points during the season and well enough that the team made it to the Conference Title game, and played well enough in that game to win it,and conveiniently you left out the Super Bowl in which Donovan McNabb had an all time great receiver,and the Eagles still didn&#8217;t get it done, and McNabb didn&#8217;t have a particularly good game that day either, too much Chunky Soup, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mizzo</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-1/#comment-22514</link>
		<dc:creator>Mizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22514</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an Eagles fan whether or not McNabb is the quarterback. If you were an Eagles fan you would be tired of the same theme year in and year out. 

MCNABB REALLY NEEDS RECEIVERS!!

Dude that&#039;s so obvious. Get over yourself.

Everyone that is not a hater is saying it. What makes you the only person who is right? What are you saying differently? Of the four losses in NFC Championship games, who was most at fault?

Gimme something here. You really don&#039;t have a point but to place blame on the defense THIS time. What about all the other times? What about the Cincinnati game? What about the Rams, Carolina, Chicago or MOST of the games McNabb has lost here when he&#039;s matured?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an Eagles fan whether or not McNabb is the quarterback. If you were an Eagles fan you would be tired of the same theme year in and year out. </p>
<p>MCNABB REALLY NEEDS RECEIVERS!!</p>
<p>Dude that&#8217;s so obvious. Get over yourself.</p>
<p>Everyone that is not a hater is saying it. What makes you the only person who is right? What are you saying differently? Of the four losses in NFC Championship games, who was most at fault?</p>
<p>Gimme something here. You really don&#8217;t have a point but to place blame on the defense THIS time. What about all the other times? What about the Cincinnati game? What about the Rams, Carolina, Chicago or MOST of the games McNabb has lost here when he&#8217;s matured?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-1/#comment-22505</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22505</guid>
		<description>Miz, I don&#039;t love nor Hate Donovan McNabb, I am a fan of teams not players, so there&#039;s no need for me to be adversarial for the hell of it. I read all of the posts, and the majority went like this.

&quot;McNabb really needs receivers, that&#039;s the problem&quot; or

&quot;McNabb made some bad throws, but the receivers were just terrible&quot;

Neither of which was completely true that game. I&#039;ve never said McNabb was completely at fault, In fact I think the defense should bear most of the blame, but anyway there&#039;s no point in arguing about this anymore since neither of us is going to budge. Later...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miz, I don&#8217;t love nor Hate Donovan McNabb, I am a fan of teams not players, so there&#8217;s no need for me to be adversarial for the hell of it. I read all of the posts, and the majority went like this.</p>
<p>&#8220;McNabb really needs receivers, that&#8217;s the problem&#8221; or</p>
<p>&#8220;McNabb made some bad throws, but the receivers were just terrible&#8221;</p>
<p>Neither of which was completely true that game. I&#8217;ve never said McNabb was completely at fault, In fact I think the defense should bear most of the blame, but anyway there&#8217;s no point in arguing about this anymore since neither of us is going to budge. Later&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mizzo</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-1/#comment-22490</link>
		<dc:creator>Mizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22490</guid>
		<description>Kirk read my &lt;a href=&quot;http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/19/when-are-the-eagles-gonna-win-one-for-don/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Don&lt;/a&gt; piece please. Who here has not criticized McNabb? Are you reading what we write or are you just being adversarial because you don&#039;t see what you like?

If Donovan McNabb has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://thestartingfive.net/2008/12/23/repeat-after-me-why-havent-the-philadelphia-eagles-front-office-given-donovan-mcnabb-talented-receivers/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;receiver&lt;/a&gt; like every other good quarterback in this league, then their record would have been as such and they would have been playing home in the playoffs.

Dude, I&#039;ve been a fan of this team and have covered them extensively. This is not a minority opinion.

Especially when the out of town writers come in.

In every NFC Championship game the Eagles have been in during McNabb&#039;s tenure, the receivers have been outplayed &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; he&#039;s faced teams with a total offense.

McNabb missed plenty of throws in Sunday&#039;s game. I would be a fool to not state this, but trust me...it ain&#039;t all about the quarterback here.

I&#039;m not having it and if you don&#039;t like it, go comment with all the haters on other boards.

The legend will not become fact here.

I don&#039;t mind dissent, really I don&#039;t but don&#039;t put words in my mouth.

Please read the posts before you comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirk read my <a href="http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/19/when-are-the-eagles-gonna-win-one-for-don/" rel="nofollow">Don</a> piece please. Who here has not criticized McNabb? Are you reading what we write or are you just being adversarial because you don&#8217;t see what you like?</p>
<p>If Donovan McNabb has a <a href="http://thestartingfive.net/2008/12/23/repeat-after-me-why-havent-the-philadelphia-eagles-front-office-given-donovan-mcnabb-talented-receivers/" rel="nofollow">receiver</a> like every other good quarterback in this league, then their record would have been as such and they would have been playing home in the playoffs.</p>
<p>Dude, I&#8217;ve been a fan of this team and have covered them extensively. This is not a minority opinion.</p>
<p>Especially when the out of town writers come in.</p>
<p>In every NFC Championship game the Eagles have been in during McNabb&#8217;s tenure, the receivers have been outplayed <em>and</em> he&#8217;s faced teams with a total offense.</p>
<p>McNabb missed plenty of throws in Sunday&#8217;s game. I would be a fool to not state this, but trust me&#8230;it ain&#8217;t all about the quarterback here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not having it and if you don&#8217;t like it, go comment with all the haters on other boards.</p>
<p>The legend will not become fact here.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind dissent, really I don&#8217;t but don&#8217;t put words in my mouth.</p>
<p>Please read the posts before you comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/01/18/the-starting-five-afc-and-nfc-championship-picks/comment-page-1/#comment-22478</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=3664#comment-22478</guid>
		<description>Eric, I understand that McNabb needs a number one, but people on this board refuse to criticize McNabb. Yes he needs a Number 1 and it&#039;s actually shameful that the eagles haven&#039;t gotten him one, but the man made his share of mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, I understand that McNabb needs a number one, but people on this board refuse to criticize McNabb. Yes he needs a Number 1 and it&#8217;s actually shameful that the eagles haven&#8217;t gotten him one, but the man made his share of mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

