<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday Morning Starting Five: March 5, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestartingfive.net/2009/03/05/thursday-morning-starting-five-march-5-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/03/05/thursday-morning-starting-five-march-5-2009/</link>
	<description>Bangin’ and Scorin’ Every Trip Down the Floor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temple3</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/03/05/thursday-morning-starting-five-march-5-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-24001</link>
		<dc:creator>Temple3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=4475#comment-24001</guid>
		<description>Up for a little 7-on-7 -- NBA style?  Brandon Roy(7) vs. Chauncey Billups (7).  Blazers - Nuggets.  Should be great!  Who you got?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up for a little 7-on-7 &#8212; NBA style?  Brandon Roy(7) vs. Chauncey Billups (7).  Blazers &#8211; Nuggets.  Should be great!  Who you got?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temple3</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/03/05/thursday-morning-starting-five-march-5-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23998</link>
		<dc:creator>Temple3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=4475#comment-23998</guid>
		<description>CP3 is not havin&#039; it tonite!  &quot;Take that!!  And, that!! Smack, pap, smack-smack!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CP3 is not havin&#8217; it tonite!  &#8220;Take that!!  And, that!! Smack, pap, smack-smack!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerold Wells Jr</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/03/05/thursday-morning-starting-five-march-5-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23988</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerold Wells Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=4475#comment-23988</guid>
		<description>I read earlier today that Torry Holt wants out. What&#039;s the over/under for recievers over 30? Where do you put such a move on your risk vs. reward scale?

My Vikings desperately need a reciever the caliber of Owens, Holt, or Harrison. 

But what can they give? What do they still have? Of the three I think Harrison has the least left due to the knee injury and I think he&#039;s also the eldest of the trio. 

Any thoughts? Oh yeah, what&#039;s up with Chad Johnson? Is he available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read earlier today that Torry Holt wants out. What&#8217;s the over/under for recievers over 30? Where do you put such a move on your risk vs. reward scale?</p>
<p>My Vikings desperately need a reciever the caliber of Owens, Holt, or Harrison. </p>
<p>But what can they give? What do they still have? Of the three I think Harrison has the least left due to the knee injury and I think he&#8217;s also the eldest of the trio. </p>
<p>Any thoughts? Oh yeah, what&#8217;s up with Chad Johnson? Is he available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temple3</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/03/05/thursday-morning-starting-five-march-5-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-23956</link>
		<dc:creator>Temple3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=4475#comment-23956</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad Ray is staying with the Ravens as well.  He&#039;s the face of the franchise.  Too bad the Eagles (Dawkins) and Buccaneers (Brooks) couldn&#039;t follow suit.  Given the departure of legendary players in Philly and Tampa over the past few years, neither situation is all that surprising.  

I think the Cowboys are looking weaker on both sides of the ball right now.  Losing Owens doesn&#039;t help their offense -- unless they can keep Felix Jones and Marion Barber healthy and get a great deal more from Roy Williams.  (When they signed RW, I thought that was the beginning of the end for Owens in Dallas, but he was so ineffective that I figured Dallas would continue on their path.)  

Keith Brooking might make them a little better - but he might make them older and slower, too.  With Lewis off the table, it seems to me that they really need to look at signing Peppers if they don&#039;t want to get steamrolled next season.  

The 13-3 teams from 2007 both took steps back last season (Dallas, Green Bay), as did the Super Bowl loser from &#039;05 (Seattle).  Dallas plays them both next year.  Seattle and GB look better (right now) than the Cowboys for &#039;09.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad Ray is staying with the Ravens as well.  He&#8217;s the face of the franchise.  Too bad the Eagles (Dawkins) and Buccaneers (Brooks) couldn&#8217;t follow suit.  Given the departure of legendary players in Philly and Tampa over the past few years, neither situation is all that surprising.  </p>
<p>I think the Cowboys are looking weaker on both sides of the ball right now.  Losing Owens doesn&#8217;t help their offense &#8212; unless they can keep Felix Jones and Marion Barber healthy and get a great deal more from Roy Williams.  (When they signed RW, I thought that was the beginning of the end for Owens in Dallas, but he was so ineffective that I figured Dallas would continue on their path.)  </p>
<p>Keith Brooking might make them a little better &#8211; but he might make them older and slower, too.  With Lewis off the table, it seems to me that they really need to look at signing Peppers if they don&#8217;t want to get steamrolled next season.  </p>
<p>The 13-3 teams from 2007 both took steps back last season (Dallas, Green Bay), as did the Super Bowl loser from &#8217;05 (Seattle).  Dallas plays them both next year.  Seattle and GB look better (right now) than the Cowboys for &#8217;09.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

