<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weapons of Mass Production?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestartingfive.net/2009/07/11/weapons-of-mass-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/07/11/weapons-of-mass-production/</link>
	<description>Bangin’ and Scorin’ Every Trip Down the Floor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/07/11/weapons-of-mass-production/comment-page-1/#comment-27975</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=6527#comment-27975</guid>
		<description>If Philly can stay healthy, and they get decent contributions from rookies McCoy, Maclin, and Ingram I could see them making a run to the Super Bowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Philly can stay healthy, and they get decent contributions from rookies McCoy, Maclin, and Ingram I could see them making a run to the Super Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Murphy</title>
		<link>http://thestartingfive.net/2009/07/11/weapons-of-mass-production/comment-page-1/#comment-27921</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartingfive.net/?p=6527#comment-27921</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with youcon the receiver corp. I still feel they need a low end 1 or a hi 2. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I think the team this year could be the most talented, al beit unproven maybe, we&#039;ve ever had.  We went from having an O line that had serious issues to potentially the best we&#039;ve had. I know D-Macs run is not too far from being over. I am one of the most diehard McNabb defenders you&#039;ll ever meet. I just think we need an experienced, solid 1-2. Curtis may come back and do just that this year but I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with youcon the receiver corp. I still feel they need a low end 1 or a hi 2. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think the team this year could be the most talented, al beit unproven maybe, we&#8217;ve ever had.  We went from having an O line that had serious issues to potentially the best we&#8217;ve had. I know D-Macs run is not too far from being over. I am one of the most diehard McNabb defenders you&#8217;ll ever meet. I just think we need an experienced, solid 1-2. Curtis may come back and do just that this year but I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

